<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Commenting Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.coreyjf.com/2008/09/commenting-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.coreyjf.com/2008/09/commenting-policy/</link>
	<description>Not an 80&#039;s actor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: eldevlin</title>
		<link>http://www.coreyjf.com/2008/09/commenting-policy/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>eldevlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 22:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.coreyjf.com/blog/?p=246#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get much feedback on my blog. Doubt I get much traffic either.
I wouldn&#039;t approve that message you received because it is obviously not from the person he/she purports to be. I also have an &quot;ick&quot; against unsubstantiated comments. &quot;Obama is an idiot.&quot; I might agree or disagree but that statement alone doesn&#039;t mean much without something behind it. If something were outright slanderous, I doubt I would let it stand. I guess my litmus test would be based on substance. I don&#039;t care if you agree or disagree with me but I want substance (facts, objective links) behind what you are saying. Obama is an idiot and McCain soils his pants wouldn&#039;t be enough for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get much feedback on my blog. Doubt I get much traffic either.<br />
I wouldn&#8217;t approve that message you received because it is obviously not from the person he/she purports to be. I also have an &#8220;ick&#8221; against unsubstantiated comments. &#8220;Obama is an idiot.&#8221; I might agree or disagree but that statement alone doesn&#8217;t mean much without something behind it. If something were outright slanderous, I doubt I would let it stand. I guess my litmus test would be based on substance. I don&#8217;t care if you agree or disagree with me but I want substance (facts, objective links) behind what you are saying. Obama is an idiot and McCain soils his pants wouldn&#8217;t be enough for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
